5XÉçÇø

The energy transition is the largest technology transfer problem of this century, and it is being negotiated under conditions of acute political uncertainty. Developing societies are asked to decarbonise using technologies they largely do not own, financed through instruments they do not control, on timelines set elsewhere. This panel asks what that arrangement does to democratic governance in the states expected to implement it, and whether technology transfer today builds industrial capability or deepens dependence.
Four lines of inquiry organise the panel. The first concerns transfer itself: licensing terms, intellectual property, local content requirements, joint ventures and standard setting determine whether a recipient country acquires capability or merely assembles imported hardware. The second concerns finance and conditionality. Multilateral banks, aid agencies, bilateral partnerships and private capital increasingly shape national energy and industrial policy, raising a difficult question about where accountability sits when consequential decisions are negotiated outside domestic political institutions. The third concerns distribution. Tariff reform, subsidy withdrawal, land acquisition for renewable installations, critical mineral extraction and the displacement of workers in carbon intensive sectors generate concentrated losses and diffuse gains, which is the classic recipe for political backlash. The fourth concerns the administrative state. Digital identity, algorithmic targeting and data infrastructures now mediate how development programmes reach citizens, altering the terms of transparency, exclusion and redress.
Consistent with the committee's comparative mandate, we welcome papers examining the political, administrative, legal and institutional frameworks that govern technology and sustainable development. Single country studies, paired comparisons and cross regional work are all welcome, as are quantitative, qualitative and policy analytic approaches. We especially encourage evidence from Asia, Africa and Latin America, and papers that bring economists and political scientists into contact.
The panel's argument is that technology transfer is not a technical transaction but a political settlement, and that the durability of the transition depends on whether that settlement can be democratically defended in the countries bearing its costs. The papers together aim to identify the institutional conditions under which it can be.