

New Issue of IPSR Published (September 2025)
Publication date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025
The latest issue of the International Political Science Review (IPSR) (Volume 46, Number 4, September 2025) features articles on a range of current conceptual and empirical issues in comparative and international politics.
In their piece 鈥溾, Andressa Butture Kniess and Francisco Paulo Jamil Marques examine the Brazilian case for lawmakers鈥 transparency policies, revealing a high level of activity, albeit with little to show for it in terms of transparency in the Brazilian House of Representatives.
In their article 鈥溾, Carsten Anckar and Thomas Sedelius take a closer look at the phenomenon of 鈥榗ohabitation鈥 and its impact on presidential powers. They find that presidential power is reduced under cohabitation, with the most significant effect evidenced in semi-presidential systems where presidents are popularly elected. Meanwhile, on the issue of anti-dumping measures, Vartika Arora and K Narayanan draw on a case study of India鈥檚 anti-dumping policy to paint an interesting and detailed picture of the relationship between India and the WTO in their piece 鈥.鈥
In a study on voter preferences regarding foreign aid, Esoi Cho, in an article entitled 鈥,鈥 finds that ideology and economic self-interest have a conditional effect on voters鈥 attitudes toward public and private foreign aid. Jacob Richard Thomas, Lemeng Liang, Shigeto Sonoda, and Yu Xie explore the . What they discovered are negative effects on both countries, particularly China, with some notable exceptions. In a fascinating study of , Shale Horowitz finds that authoritarian regimes tend to experience shorter periods of ethno-territorial wars than do democracies, as concessions to rebels are easier to make in regimes with less transparency. Under authoritarian regimes, as it turns out, a higher tolerance for the cost of war was found to be a much weaker factor than expected. Shaimaa Magued sheds further light on decision-making processes within authoritarian regimes by . The study draws important general conclusions regarding foreign policy decisions taken by authoritarian regimes. On the issue of regime type, Raul Magni-Berton explores the meaning and properties of direct democracy through a theoretical lens. More specifically, 鈥溾 provides a deeper analysis of consensus-building processes in direct democracies. Finally, in a novel analysis of crowdsourcing, Kyle Marquardt, Daniel Pemstein, Constanza Sahueza Petrarca, Brigitte Seim, Steven Lloyd Wilson, Michael Bernhard, Michael Coppedge, and Staffan Lindberg examine the . They find that while crowdworkers can substitute for experts when it comes to performing simple information-retrieval tasks, there appears to be little indication that crowdworkers can stand in for experts in the more complex process of gathering and synthesizing information.